Content Recency & Accuracy
Identify stale dates, outdated financial years, broken documents, conflicting figures and other content that may no longer reflect the organisation's current position.
For regulated organisations, a website can simultaneously:
That means a website is no longer simply a publishing platform.
It is part of the organisation's regulated digital estate.
The question is no longer only whether the website works. The question is whether the organisation can evidence how it is being governed.
The same website is usually reviewed by different teams for different reasons.
The result is often several reviews, several spreadsheets and no single evidence base showing:
What was checked.
What was not.
What needs action.
Who owns it.
What changed later.
AuditIQ reports coverage before conclusions.
For every audit dimension, the report states:
Observed
A condition was directly detected.
Suspected
A machine-readable signal was found but requires confirmation.
Needs human review
Context or judgement is required.
Unevidenced
The matter cannot be established from the public website alone.
Uncertainty is recorded — not hidden.
AuditIQ deliberately does not produce an overall compliance score. A critical consent issue should not become less important because several low-severity technical observations were satisfactory.
Instead, AuditIQ preserves the context of individual findings through:
and combines severity with decision provenance:
No score. Just evidence, context and action.
Anatomy of a finding
Page → Evidence → Rule → Owner → Action
Where was it observed?
Page or URL
What did AuditIQ detect?
The specific condition or indicator
What is the evidence?
Observed page element, content or structural signal
What is it assessed against?
Applicable regulation, clause, guideline or standard
How serious is it?
Severity and assessment status
Who should own it?
Compliance, DPO, Digital, Product, Technology, Content or other relevant role
What should happen next?
Specific remediation recommendation
AuditIQ groups related findings into actionable jobs so teams can work on the underlying fix rather than manage hundreds of individual rows.
A reference audit produced:
Approve
Include it in the final audit.
Hold
Pause it with a recorded reason.
Ignore
Set it aside with a mandatory explanation.
Decisions are recorded rather than silently deleting findings. The report can then be rebuilt from the same audit evidence without re-crawling the website.
When a later audit is performed, AuditIQ can distinguish between:
An issue is not called fixed simply because it disappeared from the next spreadsheet.
Progress should be evidenced with the same discipline as the original finding.
AuditIQ produces client-branded outputs designed for both leadership and operating teams.
PDF report
Structured executive and detailed audit output.
Excel workbook
Detailed findings, actions, owners, evidence and supporting tables.
Web report
A browser-based view of the same audit evidence.
The report can include:
They should be governed through evidence:
What was checked.
What was found.
What could not be checked.
Who owns the response.
And whether it was genuinely fixed.